Is red light therapy beneficial for skin health and appearance?

    Last Updated: October 13, 2024

    Red light therapy might be beneficial for some aspects of skin health and appearance (e.g., acne, wrinkles), but it's hard to say much with certainty due to limited high-quality research.

    Red light therapy is sometimes used as a treatment for acne, possibly by reducing inflammation and sebum production.[1] However, most of the research on this topic is not very high-quality (often lacking appropriate control groups, for example).[2][3][4][5][6]

    Some research suggests red light therapy can increase the dermal synthesis of collagen and elastin,[7][8] proteins that help maintain skin elasticity and which tend to decrease during aging. Consistent with this, a few clinical trials suggest red light therapy can indeed reduce the appearance of wrinkles,[9] although only a few studies exist, so more research is needed.

    Finally, it’s been suggested that red light exposure may make the skin less susceptible to sunburns. The evidence for this draws largely from a single pilot study involving 15 people. In that study, regularly exposing the skin to red light — specifically a wavelength of 660 nm at an intensity of 60 mW/cm2 for 160 seconds — seemed to result in less erythema (redness) in response to UV exposure (although statistical significance was not examined).[10] Subsequent (unpublished) data from the same researcher indicated that this protective effect was greater with near-infrared light than red light. Ultimately, given the preliminary nature of this data, this finding requires replication. And even if red/near-infrared light does in fact have a sunburn-inhibiting effect, it can’t yet be assumed this translates into a reduction in UV-induced DNA damage, meaning that whether red light therapy reduces the risk of skin cancer is unclear.

    References

    1. ^Pei S, Inamadar AC, Adya KA, Tsoukas MMLight-based therapies in acne treatment.Indian Dermatol Online J.(2015)
    2. ^Li J, Li J, Zhang L, Liu X, Cao Y, Wang P, Wang XComparison of red light and blue light therapies for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris: A randomized controlled clinical study.Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed.(2022-Sep)
    3. ^Tang X, Li C, Ge S, Chen Z, Lu LEfficacy of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of inflammatory acne vulgaris: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Cosmet Dermatol.(2020-Jan)
    4. ^Aziz-Jalali MH, Tabaie SM, Djavid GEComparison of Red and Infrared Low-level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.Indian J Dermatol.(2012-Mar)
    5. ^Szymańska A, Budzisz E, Erkiert-Polguj AThe Anti-Acne Effect of Near-Infrared Low-Level Laser Therapy.Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol.(2021)
    6. ^Na JI, Suh DHRed light phototherapy alone is effective for acne vulgaris: randomized, single-blinded clinical trial.Dermatol Surg.(2007-Oct)
    7. ^Prabhu V, Rao BSS, Rao ACK, Prasad K, Mahato KKPhotobiomodulation invigorating collagen deposition, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki67 expression during dermal wound repair in mice.Lasers Med Sci.(2022-Feb)
    8. ^Yohei Tanaka, Kiyoshi Matsuo, Shunsuke YuzurihaLong-term evaluation of collagen and elastin following infrared (1100 to 1800 nm) irradiationJ Drugs Dermatol.(2009 Aug)
    9. ^Jared Jagdeo, Evan Austin, Andrew Mamalis, Christopher Wong, Derek Ho, Daniel M SiegelLight-emitting diodes in dermatology: A systematic review of randomized controlled trialsLasers Surg Med.(2018 Jan 22)
    10. ^Barolet D, Boucher ALED photoprevention: reduced MED response following multiple LED exposures.Lasers Surg Med.(2008-Feb)